THIS SECTION IS WRITTEN WITH HIGH DIFFICULTY, WHILE THE AUTHOR IS IN BED, PPARAPLEGIC WITH ONE HAND, WITH ONE FINGER LEFT, WITHOUT SENSATIONS (TOUCH AND PRESSURE FEELINGS, DIFFICULT TO WRITE CORRECTLY, EVEN TO SIGN HIS SIGNATURE) BY A THIRD BRAIN STROKE FOR ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO. See, also, section (34b).

EVERYTHING THAT IS WRITTEN IN THIS SECTION, IS VALID AND TRUE, EXCEPT UNNOTICED SMALL TYPO MISTAKES.

The result of the above TV tube (or Cathode Ray tube) is the final speed of an electron is bigger than its initial speed: U final > U_Xinitial which can enter into another tube like this one; at point A, following the original direction of U_Xand similarly. into another such tube and so on... Finally redirected in to the first one at point A with the same direction as the original of U_X, U reaching as much exponentially high values of free energy, towards infinity and self destruction, as with every other perpetual mobile happens, and without any relevant consumption of energy......
This example proves the principle of creation with tremendous economic and social implications, when a limiter is applied to avoid infinity and self-destruction. .

IMPROVED VERSION click₁ here for correcting the right end effect and click₂here for answering several invited suggestions

NON CONSERVATION OF ENERGY-PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUOUS CREATION OF ENERGY- IN CONFORMITY OF THE GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUOUS CREATION-see below (selection column)

Standard TV Cathode or Oscilloscope tube with only one vertical diversion electrodes, electrostatically charged, assuming well insulated, without any leakage, provision is made for U_xis big enough or most important, the distance between the electrodes of vertical diversion, so that no electrons reach the upper positive plate.

Assuming, though we doubt very much that the passing electron through the whole of the anode, has paid its energy ticket, the velocity U_xat is determined as the accelerated velocity according to the potential difference between cathode and anode, without consuming any energy from the potential difference. We clearly claim that the vertical gained there velocity U_{Y
is also totally unjustified. Below we prove this last statement.

The total kinetic energy of the passing electron through is
therefore E = 1/2 mU}² = 1/2mU_X^{2 +1/2m U}_Y^{2 . .with}_U^2=U_X^{2 + U}_Y^{2
. and U .> U}_X

_{Which is the initial velocity after the electron passed the anode at
point A and nothing is consumed there by this passing there.}

^{The energy
1/2m U}_Y²is a created new energy- as free energy of the system This amount of energy can be repeated for as many electrons we can wait for,
click here, for seeing the diagram of repeating gaining free energy electron
and without any corresponding energy consumption. The principle of conservation of energy is not generally valid. Energy is not always conserved. See also PAPIMI as at least 120% over unity device, here. below (selection column). The above configuration is a miniature accelerator compared to CERN accelerator. However, what we are concerned is the relevant understanding of the people there about non conservation of energy or energy continuous creation or energy's possibility of increase to selfdistruction that these people did not expect.

The Principle of leas/t action for the above system for the Theoretical Phycist, CERN Scientist and any other relevant Professional.

The principle of least action is considered as the most advanced method in Theoretical .Physics in this case. However, for conservation of energy, the symmetry with respect to time is required However, as we have already shown in an elementary way, there is no symmetry in time for the energy increases with time So one of the basic requirements of this Principle is not fulfilled in this case. Tautologically, therefore, the Principle of least action is trivial here and can not offer more than we have shown for the non conservation of energy of the above system.

If we are wrong, 100000 Euros reward for the first claimer, as it is offered in other places in this site. None has self made a claim today 29/1/2012 morning yet! We receive only supporting messages.

NEWER CONSIDERATION: THE ABOVE SUSPENSION IS CANCELLED 24 HOURS AFTER ITS ACTIVATION. NOTE:: THE SUSPENSION WAS FIRST IMPOSED TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF AN ARGUMENT, PRODUCED AN INVITED FELLOW PROFESSOR FROM A NORTHERN UNIVERSITY. THE ARGUMENT WAS FOUND INCORRECT

In case you have made a claim or to confirm your claim or because it was lost, please call personally Pro.PT Pappas at code +30210. office number 9270807, Home number 9012028, Fax +302109011620 or mobile or cell phone, code + 30, number 6944338415, e-mail ppappas@papimi.gr, local time +2 hours GMT (Greenwich Mean Time) or +3 hours GMT taking into account the silly summer time, in case, it is applicable..+ international code as defined by the calling country, 30 code for Greece, 210 code for the city of Athens. Ordinary postal address is not given for security reasons. VALID CONTACTS ARE THOSE GIVEN HERE BY PHONE ,FAX, AND E-MAIL.
SOME PEOPLE, NOT DARING TO CONTACT US PROPERLY. THEY ARE BLUFFING TO CREATE WRONG IMPRESSIONS BY HIDING FROM US THEIR ALLEGED OBJECTIONS. .
LANGUAGE OF CONTACT SHOULD BE GREEK OR ENGLISH
with the power of logic

NOTE1: Claimers should contact us. See contacts in the front page. None has made a claim, today

NOTE 2: Claimers should make their claims on the current accepted physical laws taught at generally recognized Universities except the principle of conservation Energy which is shown here generally not correct..

NOTE 3 Do not hesitate to claim, nothing to lose, nothing to pay! All correspondence will be posted here. None has self made a claim oyet, morning

29/1/2012, neither by e-mail or directly by phone or Fax. We receive only supporting messages.

NEWER CONSIDERATION: THE ABOVE SUSPENSION IS CANCELLED 24 HOURS AFTER ITS ACTIVATION. NOTE:: THE 1SUSPENSION WAS FIRST IMPOSED TO ALLOW TIME FOR THE CORRECTNESS OF AN ARGUMENT, PRODUCED AN INVITED FELLOW PROFESSOR FROM A NORTHERN UNIVERSITY. THE ARGUMENT WAS FOUND INCORRECT

A Second independent proof will be added here soon.......FOR THE PROOF SEE BELOW.

Dedicated to the late Stefan Marinov and Leon Dragone who were dedicated in all their short lifes to perpetual mobile. I wish they were with us to know the above indisputable example.

with the power of logic

Notice 0, The left or entering electron end effect is always accelerating, favoring our conclusions and results for the creation or excess energy.

The electric field of two opposite charges Ntice the corespondin end effects is relative very curved.

The electrical field of two elongated distributed opposite charges by a distance x, Notice the corresponding end effect is lessened with respect to the above end effects The radius of curvature of the end effects is shorterer the shorter is the radius of curvature compared the capacitor below. This a very important element here.

Similarly, the electric field of two elongated distributed charges, capacitor distributions. The length of distribution here is x +Δx. Notice the slight variation and inwards smoothening of the end effects lessened by a second and higher order but definite amount of magnitude. The longer is the capacitor by Δx the bigger is the radius of curvature at the end effects. Thi is a very key element here to prove, beyond any doubt, the non conservation of energy or better the creation of energy and from this creation of universe. See text.

Thus, checking the electrical lines in reality in a charged capacitor, the end effect of the capacitor is lessened the longer the capacitor is!

The end effect of the lines is obvious at the two ends of the capacitor. The higher position is the exit of the electron, the higher is the horizontal draw back on the electron. However, if we assume the capacitor becomes a little longer by an amount Δx The end effect of this lethening will be only secondary (second order or higher and of the opposite sign) to Δx .However the vertical gained velocity upwards of the electron will be inverse proportional to the first order of Δx . This is a contradiction and excludes the fact the end effect of the electric field will compensates the extra energy gained by the electron. This proves that THE END EFFECT WILL NOT MAKE THE ENERGY TO BE CONSERVED AS IT ASSUMED IN CLASSICAL PHYSICS. Q.E.D