SUPER LUMINAL VELOCITIES, DISPROVING EINSTEIN AND THE MICHELSON MORLEY CLASSICAL EXPERIMENT, FOR 5000 EUROS OF PRIVATE BUDGET.
TIME SPACE QUANTIZED SIGNALS TRAVELLING FASTER THAN LIGHT
SUMMARY
Verification of the older experiment presented by P.T Pappas and Alexander Obolenski, in Electronics and Wireless World in December 1, 1988, with the title "Thirty six nanoseconds faster than light" . In the present experiments we have observed the same signals. The new finding was that signals arrived simultaneously sending them with two lines of insulated copper wire 2.5 mm thick. The short being 15.8 meters long and the longer 39 meters long. Both wires were fed with the same signal origininated from a signal generator and split in two. The signal arrived at the other ends of both wires at the same time (quantized ?), no matter the distance it travelled in the two wires, differing by a factor of about 3 in length approximately. However, there was a fixed constant common delay (QUANTIZED ?) in both wires approximately about 20 nanoseconds, no matter of their length as compared by the storage oscilloscope, measuring them from the beginning to the ends of both wires This common constant (quantized ?) delay of unequal travelling distances, is not clearly understood by us.. The corresponding travelling speeds though unequal distances, were superluminal in both wires approximately L/20nanoseconds = 15.8 meter/20 nanoseconds and 39 meters/20 nanoseconds = approximately 0.75/3 x109 meters/second = 7.5/3x300.000km/second i.e. 7.5/3 times faster than light and 22.5/3 times faster than light approximately. In a last experiment we used 100 meters long line the delay was 100 nanoseconds, an integral multiple of 20 nanoseconds..
TODAY'S EXPERIMENTS IN ATHENS
INTRODUCTORY EXPLANATIONS FOR THE APPEARANCE OF SQUARE PULSE ON A FAST DIGITAL AND STORAGE OSCILLOSCOPE
PIC.
1 PIC.
2
THE SAME PULSES WITH OSCILLOSCOPE
SETTINGS SET FASTER
OSCILLOSCOPE PICTURES OF SQUARE PULSE, WITH THE TIME SETTING OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE GOING FASTER

PIC. 4 THE SAME PULSES WITH OSCILLOSCOPE
PIC. 3
SETTINGS SET FASTER
PICTURES OF SQUARE PULSE WITH TIME SETTING OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE GOING EVEN FASTER FROM THE THE RIGHT TO THE LEFT.
PIC. 5 THE SAME PULSES WITH OSCILLOSCOPE
SETTINGS SET FASTER
THE OSCILLOSCOPE IS SET EVEN FASTER. NOW THE VERTICAL SIDE WALL OF THE SQUARE PULSE DOES NOT LOOK VERTICAL ANY MORE. THIS IS BECAUSE, THE LOW STATE OF THE PULSE CAN NOT CHANGE INSTANTLY TO THE HIGH STATE, IT TAKES SOME TIME FOR IT. WHEN THE TIME SETTING OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE IS COMPARABLE TO THIS TIME OF THE RISING WALL FOR THE PULSE, THIS WALL DOES NOT LOOK VERTICAL, BU INCLINED, TO THE EYE. THIS IS THE CORRECT PICTURE FOR THE TIME SETTING OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE.

PIC. 6 THE SAME PULSES
PIC. 7 THE SAME PULSES
WITH OSCILLOSCOPE
WITH OSCILLOSCOPE
SETTINGS SET VERY FAST SETTINGS SET EVEN FASTER
THE TIME SETTING OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE IS SET HIGHER AND HIGHER TO HIGHER TIME RESOLUTION. THE INCLINATION OF THE VERTICAL WALL OF THE SQUARE PULSE LOOKS MORE AND MORE INCLINED.
NOTE 1: ONE SIGNAL IS INVERTED INSIDE THE STORAGE OSCILLOSCOPE ON PURPOSE FOR
EASIER COMPARISON REASONS, SO THEY BOTH ARE RISING, THOUGH ONE GOES DOWN
NOTE 2: YOU MIGHT SUGEST THAT A SQUARE PULSE MAY BE ANALYZED INTO MANY FOURIER
COMPONENTS. NEVER THE LESS INFORMATION TRAVELS FASTER THAN LIGHT THAT MAY INFORM
ME WHEN A RELAY WAS CLOSING OR OPENING AS IT IS THE CASE WITH THE EXPERIMENTS
WITH ALEXANDER OBOLENSKY BELOW
NOTE 3: WHEN ONE PROBE OF THE TWO CHANNEL OSCILLOSCOPE WAS DISCONNECTED, ITS CORRESPONDING SIGNAL DISAPPEARED, WHICH MEANS THE
SHOWED TRACES ARE NOT AN INTERNAL ART FACT OF THE PARTICULAR OSCILLOSCOPE
NOTE 4: YOU NEED A STORAGE OSCILLOSCOPE TO SEE THESE SIGNALS, PRODUCED AFTER THE YEAR 1990
NOTICE 5: TODAY'S EXPERIMENTS WERE CARRIED WITH VOLTAGE SIGNALS IN CONTRAST, WITH THE 1988 OBOLENSKY EXPERIMENTS BELOW, THAT WERE CARRIED WITH CURRENT SIGNALS. SO, BOTH VOLTAGE AND CURRENT EXHIBIT SUPERLUMINAL VELOCITIES THAT MEANS THAT POWER AND ENERGY EXHIBIT SUPERLUMINAL PROPAGATION.
NOTE 6 ONE OF THE SIGNALS IS INVERTED INSIDE THE OSCILLOSCOPE. SO ONE APPEARS RISING AS IT IS REALLY RISING AND THE OTHER APPEARS DECREASING IN THE OSCILLOSCOPE OPPOSITE WHAT IS HAPPENING IN REALITY. THI IS DONE FOR EASIER COMPARISONS REASONS.
VERY IMPORTANT NOTE FOR THE QUANTIZATION: 39/15,8=2,468. CONSIDERING NOW THE
INTEGER
OF n-1=1, WHERE n IS THE RATIO OF 39/15,8= 2,468. SIMILARLY, 100/15,8=6,39
CONSIDERING AGAIN INTEGER OF n-1= 5, WHERE n IS THE RATIO OF 100/15,8=6,329. WE
SEE WHY 1X20 NANOSECONDS FITS WITH 15,8 AND 39 METERS. AS WELL AS, WHY
5X20 NANOSECONDS FITS WITH 100 METERS. WHILE 1X20 FITS WITH 15,8.
NOT ENOUGH AND ACCURATE DATA TO DETERMINE THE EXACT VALUES FOR SPACE AND
TIME QUANTIZATION.
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM 1. OF THE EXPERIMENTS, NOT IN SCALE.
THE RESOLUTION OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE WAS HIGHER IN THESE EXPERIMENTS, AND THE VOLTAGE SENSITIVITY IS LESS FOR BOTH CHANNELS'.

PIC. 8 SIGNALS RECEIVED FROM ONE LINE 39 METERS, EXCITED BY THE SAME RECTANGLE
PULSE,
SHOWING 20 NANOSECONDS DELAY. IT CORRESPONDS TO VOP (velocity
of propagation) 22.5C/3

PIC. 9 DELAY MEASURED FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END OF LINE 15.8 LONG, SHOWING 20 NANOSECONDS DELAY, IT CORRESPONDS TO 7.5C/3

PIC. 10 DELAY OF 100 NANOSECONDS, INTEGRAL MULTIPLE OF 20 NANOSECONDS, FOR A LINE OF 100 METERS LONG,. NOTE THE LINE OF 100 METERS WAS NOT DEVELOPED COMPLETELY FOR THERE WAS NOT ENOUGH SPACE IN THE LAB, BUT IT WAS PARTIALLY WRAPPED. VOP CORRESPONDS TO 100 METERS/100X10-9 nanoseconds=1x109 meters/second= 10C/3.

PIC. 11 COMPARING THE TWO SIGNALS RECEIVED BY 15.8 METERS LONG LINE AND 39 METERS LONG LINE. THEY ARRIVE SIMULTANEOUSLY, AS NATURALLY EXPECTED AFTER HAVING BOTH A COMMON 20 NANOSECOND DELAY (QUANTIZED ?:), THOUGH THEY TRAVEL UNEQUAL DISTANCES

PIC. 12 THE SIGNAL GENERATOR SHOWING 20.9 HZ SQUARE PULSE. WE GET THE SAME PICTURES WITH MUCH HIGHER FREQUENCIES
==========================================================================================
OLDER EXPERIMENTS PERFORMED IN TAXEDO PARK OF NEW YORK, AND PUBLISHED IN ELECTRONIC AND WIRE LESS WORLD IN 1988
PIC. 13
PIC. 14
PIC. 15
click to enlarge
PIC. 16
REFERENCES
- P.T. Pappas, (Experiments – Superluninal Propagation Velocity of Signals),
Electronics and Wireless World, p. 132, Feb.1989.
- P.T. Pappas, (Experiments – Superluninal Propagation Velocity of Signals),
Electronics and Wireless World, p.414, April 1989.
- P.T. Pappas (Experiments – Superluninal Propagation Velocity of Signals)
Letters to Electronics and Wireless World, p. 299, March 1989.
- P.T. Pappas ( Experiments – Superluninal Propagation Velocity of Signals) : T.
Sacks, New Scientist, p.35, January 14, 1989.
- P.T. Pappas in : - A. Kladouchou, Periscopio tis Epistimis, 114/20, 1989. (in
Greek)
- P.T. Pappas in : - A. Kladouchou, Periscopio tis Epistimis, 118/68, 1989. (in
Greek)
- P.T. Pappas in : N. Argyropoulou, Davlos, February 1989, issue 86, page 4894
(in Greek)
- P.T. Pappas and A.G. Obolensky, Electr. & Wireless World, 94, 1162-5, Nov.
1988.
- THE TIMES (London) 29 November 1988
SUPERLUMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL SUBLUMINAL SIGNAL VELOCITIES,
DISPROVING THE MICHELSON MOLER EXPERIMENT AND EINSTEIN
THE EXISTENCE OF EVANESCENT EFFECT
NOTE 1: NO SIGNAL IS INVERTED INSIDE THE OSCILLOSCOPE IN THESE EXPERIMENTS, BOTH SIGNALS RISE IN THE OSCILLOSCOPE, AS THEY DO IN REALITY.
NOTE 2: THE LONG LINE SIGNAL , BLUE TRACE, APPEARS TO OSCILLATE HIGHER ABOVE THE SHORT LINE SIGNAL, YELLOW TRACE. THIS IS BECAUSE THE LONGER LINE POSSESSES MORE INDUCTANCE.
NOTE 3 THE DIRECT (YELLOW) APPEAR TO CURVE INSTEAD OF BEING A SQUARE PULSE WITH A VERTICAL WALLS, THIS IS SO IN REALITY. THEY ARE SHOWN HERE BECAUSE THE OSCILLOSCOPE IS SET IN A VERY FAST ENOUGH MODE.
exp1.jpg
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM 2. OF THE EXPERIMENTS, , NOT
IN SCALE.
THE TIME
RESOLUTION IS LESS BUT THE VOLTAGE SENSITIVITY IS HIGHER 500 MV HERE
IT APPEARS SIMULTANEITY OF THE TWO SIGNALS, ONE GOING A SHORTER DIRECT ROUTE
(YELLOW ROUTE WITH THE YELLOW OSCILLOSCOPE TRACE) AND THE OTHER A LONGER ROUTE
(BLUE ROUTE WITH THE BLUE OSCILLOSCOPE TRACE), DISPROVING EINSTEIN. HOWEVER THE
TIME RESOLUTION OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE IS SET ABOUT 10 TIMES LESS 100 NS PER SQUARE
OF THE GRID, AND VOLTAGE SENSITIVITY HIGHER TO 500 MV, NOT PRACTICALLY SHOWING A DELAY ALONG THE LOOP OF 20 NS, FOUND IN
THE PREVIOUS EXPERIMENTS, WHERE THE TIME RESOLUTION OF THE OSCILLOSCOPE WAS MUCH
HIGHER, THIS SETTING OF TIME WAS CHOSEN IN ORDER TO CATCH THE NEXT MEETING POINT
AT ABOUT 260 NS LATER. NEVER THE THE SUPERLUMINOUS VELOCITY OF THE SIGNAL IS CLEARLY SHOWING
WITH THE GRADUAL INCREASE OF THE VOLTAGE IN 260/140 NS WHICH IF TAKEN INTO
ACCOUNT, THE VELOCITIES DROPS TO HALF THE VALUE OF THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT,
MISLEADING CLASSICAL PHYSICS. AS EINSTEIN WAS WRONG TO SAY SUPER LUMINAL
VELOCITIES DO NOT EXIST.
EXPERIMENTS INDICATING THE TRACE SIGNAL OF THE COPPER WIRE OF 39 METERS
PIC. 17 EXPERIMENT WITH LINE 39 METERS.
SIGNALS ARE RECEIVED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE LINE AND FROM THE END OF THE
LINE, WHICH MAKES A BIG ROUND LOOP, COMING BACK TO THE BEGINNING. THE TWO SIGNALS, FIRST APPEAR AGAIN
SIMULTANEOUSLY, THEN, THEY RISE UNEQUALLY, AS THE COPPER WIRE IS ELECTROSTATICALLY CHARGED.
AT THE BEGGING APPEARS TO CHARGE FIRST PRACTICALLY SIMULTANEOUSLY, DISPROVING EINSTEIN. THEN, THE SIGNAL FROM THE END, CATCHES UP
AGAIN, AFTER ABOUT 260 ns, UP TO THE SECOND MEETING POINT. THE TWO VERTICAL TIME
CURSORS, ARE PLACED, ONE AT THE BEGGING AND THE OTHER AT THE END OF THE LOOP,
INDICATING ABOUT 260 ns TIME DELAY. THIS DELAY IS WHAT CLASSICAL PHYSICS, POINTS,
AS THE VELOCITY OF PROPAGATION OF THE SIGNALS WHICH IN THIS CASE IS ABOUT
150.000 Km/s. T HAT IS HALF THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT.
PIC. 18 THE SAME AS ABOVE
EXPERIMENTS WITH LINE 15.8 METERS LONG.
THE CONFIGURATION OF
THE LINE 15.8 METERS, IS THE SAME CONFIGURATION, AS WITH THE LINE OF 39 METERS.
HOWEVER, THE CURSORS ARE MISPLACED, IN THIS CASE BY NEGLIGENCE. SIGNALS
APPEAR SIMULTANEOUSLY AS AS WITH LINE OF 39 METERS
THEY, ALSO, APPEAR TO HAVE CHARGED BOTH ENDS WITH THE SAME LEVEL, AFTER ABOUT 140
ns, AS ESTIMATED, COUNTING THE SQUARES OF THE SCREEN AND CONSIDERING THE CALIBRATION OF THE
OSCILLOSCOPE,
PIC. 20 THE SAME AS ABOVE
WHAT IS A FACT IN THESE EXPERIMENTS, IS THAT, REGARDLESS, THE DISTANCE WHICH THE SIGNALS TRAVELS, THEY SIGNALS US SIMULTANEOUSLY AS A PRECURSOR-EVANESCENT SIGNAL INFORMS US FOR THE PULSE, PRODUCED BY THE SIGNAL GENERATOR WITH A SUPER LUMINAL VELOCITY, AGAINST THE BELIEFS OF EINSTEIN, AGAINST HIS THEORIES AND AGAINST CONVENTIONAL PHYSICS
FARTHER ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS FOR THE PRESENT EXPERIMENTS
There appears a conflict between the first group of
experiments and the above second group. In the first group for the line of 15.8
meters and for the line of 39 meters, from their beginning to their end, we said
we found a common delay of 20 ns. However, for the second group, we found for
the same above configuration a zero delay or simultaneity. This was a
suspicious point of error. So this fact made us farthe to analyze these cases.
What could be in common for these experiments, causing a variable delay from 20
ns to zero. It came to us that t5the pulse generator even the vibrating relay
that both could produce the square pulses both had an internal resistor, for the
electronic generator in it internal electronics and out transistors and for the
vibrating relay in the associated battery-the internal resistor of this battery.
In both cases the internal resistors R could be not zero.
the wires of transmission have naturally a capacitance C. So both wires charge
practically depending on RC and the voltage sensitivity of the oscilloscope,
which was adjusted just to make the signal detectable, and we had each time to
make counter adjustments for this purpose.
So we had to carry a third group of experiments to verify
this hypothesis.
What we did we increased the internal resistor if square puls generator by
connecting external in series an 100 kΩ to its output
probe, so now the total internal resistance would become Rinitial internal
+ 100KΩ.
osllogram and schematic to be added here
THE PULSE GENERATOR IS SUPPLYING THE PULSE VIA A RERSISOR 100KΩ
TO THE LOOP OF 39 METERS
PIC. 21 THE TIME DELAY FROM THE BEGINNING TO THE END OF THE LOOP IS NOW 200 NS THAN ONLY 20 NS THAT WAS IN THE PREVIOUS EXPERIMENTS
Here is the result: 200 NS delay foe the signal as in the previous experiments which had shown 20 ns and zero delay correspondingly. So clearlyu the delay depends on internal resistor and the voltage sensitivity of our oscilloscope.
It remains to say the delay of propagation in the copper wires is practically a very big superluminus velocity even infinite, not possible to be measured. Now we are more confident that very big superluminous velocities existed and that EINSTEIN is even MORE WRONG, proven with less than 5000 Euros equipment of private budget ! THE PROPAGATION OF ELECTRICAL SUPERLUMINUS SIGNALS IS NOW FULLY UNDERSTOOD, AS INSTANTANEOUS INTERACTIONS, TRANSFERRING ENERGY PRACTICALLY INSTANTANEOUSLY, DESPITE EINSTEIN AND MODERN PHYSICS AFTER EINSTEIN*.
ATHEN 26/11/.2010
PROFESSOR Dr PT PAPPAS
*THE MYTH OF EINSTEIN
SEVERAL DARK AND ILLEGAL POINTS OF EINSTEIN
* HISTORICAL FACTS: EINSTEIN
was given the Nobel prize in 1913, not for the theories for which he became
famous and which they were disproved here, but for
the photoelectric effect, a subject very elementary and taught now at the
secondary education ! (High school!, the only such
Nobel prize subject, taught in high school) He published his main theory of SR
(Special Relativity) in Annalen der physik,
in 1905, a year after LORENTZ
transformations (which he made, leaving his Lorentz force invariant), which Lorentz published also them
in the Academy of Science Amsterdam journal, a year before, that is in 1904. His publication was
what now is the main core of EINSTEIN'S SR. Thanks to the literature which calls
them still the Lorentz transformations every where. Under, these Historical facts, one
could, say now, that EINSTEIN HAD STOLEN THE LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS FROM LORENTZ
and that Anallen der Physic which also accepted to publish the LORENTZ
transformations under EINSTEIN'S name, had done so, after an improper and
illegal
action of THIS SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF GERMANY, and an improper
and illegal action of science.
On top, EINSTEIN made no reference to LORENTZ, to MICHELSON and MORLEY, OR TO
ANY BODY ELSE. This is absolutely very exceptional and absolutely
illegal and unusual for a
scientist and for scientific Journal to accept such an illegal scientific article,
without bibliography. In order to understand the uniqueness of this case, we
have to say no other such case exists in the the History of Physics World wide.
What ever, this action may be characterized, the theory of SR and its core, the LORENTZ transformation which make the theory of SR, which is a theory with wrong
assumptions and wrong results, as they have been found here, THESE CHARACTERIZATIONS
DO NOT MATTER NOW.
MORE DARK AND ILLEGAL POINTS OF EINSTEIN
Such as, Lorentz's title of paper and Einstein's one year later paper had similar titles, "ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA IN A SYSTEM MOVING WITH ANY VELOCITY LESS THAN THAT OF LIGHT" FOR LORETZ TITLE, as Einstein, apparently, DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH IMAGINATION TO MAKE HIS TITLE, NOT CHARACTERISTICALLY SIMILAR TO LORENTZ's, HE USED AS TITLE ,THE FOLLOWING: "ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES", A COPY SUMMARY OF LORENTZ TITLE WITH THE KEY WORDS MOTION AND ELECTROMAGNETISM OR ELECTRODYNAMICS, REVEALING IN AN OBVIOUS WAY, WHERE EINSTEIN GOT HIS PAPER'S TITLE, WHICH MANY YEARS LATER RENAMED IT, ARBITRARILY AND ILLEGALLY, TO THE PROTOTYPE TITLE: 'SPECIAL RELATIVITY AND INERTIA OF ENERGY", THOUGH NO WHERE, HE REFERS TO THE RELATIVE CONCEPT, IN HIS ORIGINAL PAPER, and which we owned since long ago. (Besides EINSTEIN could not pass the entrance examination to the POLYTECHNIC when he was young, coincidence ?). ANOTHER COINCIDENCE: EINSTEIN MARRIED TWO WIVES. THE FIRST WIFE WAS A COLLEAGUE OF HIM (very clever and sophisticated) AND THE SECOND A COUSIN HOUSEWIFE. WHILE EINSTEIN WAS MARRIED TO HIS COLLEAGUE WIFE, HE WAS VERY ACTIVE AND VERY WELL SPOKEN, COMPARED TO THE PERIOD HE WAS MARRIED TO HIS SECOND COUSIN HOUSEWIFE, (not sophisticated and not so clever). COINCIDENCE?
Also, we have to add that EINSTEIN, he claid himself, without knowing the Michelson Morley experiment, which every book on Relativity has to refer to and indeed it does refer to, then, Einstein could not have any evidence for the constancy of the velocity of light, in order to make the necessary postulate of the constancy of the velocity of light in his theory. EINSTEIN DID NOT MAKE A REFERENCE TO THIS EXPERIMENT, BUT INSTEAD EXPLICITLY DENIED HE KNEW THE EXPERIMENT OF MICHELSON AND MORLEY (without this knowledge he could not have any idea about it . ANOTHER LIE ?
ADDITIONAL REMARKS
IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE
ABOVE IS THE FACT THAT EINSTEIN COULD NOT PASS THE ENTRANCE EXAMINATIONS TO THE
POLYTECHNIC OF ZURICH. FINALLY EINSTEIN BECAME A SCHOOL TEACHER OF MATHEMATICS
GIVING PRIVATE HELP TO WEAK STUDENTS FROM HOME TO HOME.
A CONTEMPORY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AGAINST EINSTEIN IN ZURICH WAS
CANCELLED FOR EVER JUST TWO DAYS BEFORE ITS START BECAUSE (AS IT WAS PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED ) THE ORGANIZER
ANDREI...DIED SUDDENLY BECAUSE OF AN ANEURISM ? THE AUTHOR ARRIVED AT ZURICH TO
FIND THE CONFERENCE CANCELLED THE LAST MOMENT !
THE ONLY REMINDING IS THE SURVIVAL OF THE PICTURE OF EINSTEIN WITH HIS TONGUE
COMING OUT OF HIS MOUTH AND WE SEE IT AROUND FROM TIME TO TIME !
EINSTEIN FINALLY HAD BECOME THE DIRECTOR OF THE PATENT OFFICE OF ZURICH BEFORE HE BECAME
FAMOUS. A POSITION ESPECIALLY INFLUENTIAL TO THE RICH INDUSTRY. A POSITION
USUALLY REFERRED IRONICALLY AS THE POSITION OF "A POOR CLERK".
EINSTEIN WAS DECLARED BY A POLITICAL MAGAZINE, HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH SCIENCE
(TIME), AS THE SCIENTIST OF THE CENTURY, ACCEPTED AUTOMATICALLY AND
UNQUESTIONABLY BY THE WORLD.
SOURCES
"THE PRINCIPLE OF RELATIVITY" A
COLLECTION OF ORIGINAL PAPERS, BY H.A.LORENTZ, A.
EINSTEIN, H. MINKOWSKI AND H. WEYL, WITH NOTES OF THEFAMOUS SOMMERFIELD,
DOVER PUBLICATION, INC, 1952.
NOTE: FROM THE TITLE OF THIS BOOK WE USED, WE SEE THAT THIS BOOK IS INCLINED TO
RELATIVITY AND EINSTEIN.
VARIOUS BIOGRAPHIES OF EINSTEIN.
REFERENCES
EVANESCENT EFFECTS BIBLIOGRAPHY
THE BIBLE IN ELECTRODYNAMICS FOR
POST-GRADUATE LEVEL IS CONSIDERED TO BE JACKSON'S BOOK IN ELECTRODYNAMICS
BELOW.
ON PAGE 222 TO 223, WE READ |"THE PROPAGATION OF ELECTROSTATIC
POTENTIAL IS INSTANTANEOUS". SO, WHAT, WE CLAIM HERE, IS NOT NEW FOR
ELECTROMAGNETICS. SIMPLY WE HAVE VERIFIED THESE FACTS HERE AND WE POINT THAT
THESE FACTS ARE AGAINST EINSTEIN'S BELIEVES, MODERN PHYSICS FOR CENSORING G
SUPERLUMINAL PROPAGATION IN GENERAL, KEEPING AWAY HUMANITY'S SCIENCE ON THE
MOST PROMISING SPACE TRAVELLING ASPECTS.
CLICK SEVERAL TIMES ON THE PICTURES TO ENLARGE AND READ. THEN PRESS "EXIT|" TO EXIT.
IT IS E= mc2
more general E= mc2 / (1-u2/c2)1/2 or
ΔE= Δmc2
more general ΔE= Δmc2 / (1-u2/c2)1/2
SEE ENERGY MOMENTUM LORENTZ TRANSFORMATIONS OF RELATIVITY.,
WE SEE THAT ENERGY FOR RELATIVITY THEORY AND EINSTEIN CAN NOT BE TRANSPORTED WITH A VELOCITY HIGHER THAN THE
VELOCITY OF LIGHT OR CLOSE TO THIS VELOCITY.
FOR THE ABOVE DENOMINATOR HAS NO MEANING OR FRACTION BECOMES TOO BIG, AND EVEN
FOR
CLASSICAL PHYSICS !,
Of Related Interest :
ΥΠΕΡΦΩΤΕΙΝΕΣ ΤΑΧΥΤΗΤΕΣ, Ο ΑΪΝΣΤΑΪΝ ΚΑΙ ΟΙ ΠΕΡΙΕΡΓΟΙ ΘΑΝΑΤΟΙ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΩΝ
http://www.filonoi.gr/2011/12/09/yperfoteines/
http://ksipnistere.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_2511.html
http://thesecretrealtruth.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_9417.html
http://xemandrios1.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_6281.html
http://hellenicrevenge.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_5450.html
http://stoxasmos-politikh.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_226.html
http://tosimpanpouagapisa.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post.html
http://gr.limegator.com/447538/447538.html
http://sxolianews.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_6453.html
http://www.schizas.com/site3/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=44317:2011-12-14-120000&catid=52:episthmonika&Itemid=350
http://www.ethnosnews.com/2011/12/%CF%85%CF%80%CE%B5%CF%81%CF%86%CF%89%CF%84%CE%B5%CE%B9%CE%BD%CE%B5%CF%83-%CF%84%CE%B1%CF%87%CF%85%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%84%CE%B5%CF%83-%CE%BF-%CE%B1%CF%8A%CE%BD%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B1%CF%8A%CE%BD-%CE%BA%CE%B1/