V5 Date of first posting 14/1/2009,
present
posting 30/1/2009.
POLITICS IN SCIENCE
Actually Politics in Science have been already extensively shown and published here in the section LECTURES-DIALEXEIS in the Greek language. So, as a matter of fact, we shall present here an improved translation of it. It will posted gradually and in the usual practice of ours for avoiding farther delays, i.e., as the translation progresses. It will be subject to the standard money/papimi reward "if you get us anywhere wrong", declared in our front page.
Our main example of
politics in science will be shown by making obvious to anyone the impossibility
of having a "Big Bang" for the creation of the Universe some 13.5 billion years
ago or at any other time, any where, contrary to the generally suggested wrong
theory for the creation of our Universe.
Instead, a continuous creation of matter and energy will be suggested, inside
matter, and/or in the presence of energy which takes place in every star and
every planet of our solar system, making our Universe to expand and become
bigger with time.
This theory will be obviously different from Robert Hoyl's Theory of continuous creation of matter in vacuum.
Our Theory will follow the following principles
1. Matter creates similar
matter everywhere and anytime.
2. Energy creates similar energy everywhere and anytime.
3. Vacuum creates similar vacuum.
4. Similar produces similar
Obviously, the above principles are against the fundamental principle of Physics and of the Theory of Relativity for the Law of Conservation of Matter and Energy.
The exciting thing here
will be the promised reward for any one who will prove us contrary wrong
for the above, WILL BE ALSO VALID.
We also claim that the current counter suggested relevant views are also
maintained for POLITICAL REASONS.
So surely, We expect to have a lot of future fun and excitement with the
orthodox, close minded and scared scientist.
Our main proof of the non existence of the "Big Bang" for the creation of our Universe, before 13.5 billion years, will be based on the indisputable existence of deposits on the surface of the Earth or close to the surface, for example inside mountains.
Here the word deposit will
be used not under the meaning that something was left there, but rather with the
meaning of a mine which implies that something (the mine) just exists there. We
say this having in mind the deposit of bauxite under the mountain of Parnassos
near Delphi in Greece, one of the world's biggest bauxite deposits. This example
is not exceptional but common and typical as many hundred thousands of deposits
or mines on Earth.
This particular deposit as many others, should have come into existence recently
and after the creation of the Earth, being on the surface of the rotating Earth,
just under the surface of the mountain of Parnassos. The mountain of Parnassos is
like a pin point seeing on the Globe of the Earth. The Earth makes a full
rotation in 24 hours. This rotation is not new and existed since billion of
years for the Earth, with a period of approximately 24 hours or less, which
means the Earth was always rotating in the past, even faster, and will
continuous to rotate in the future keeping its angular momentum above zero.
Now we are ready to make
the argument of the impossibility of the theory Big Bang.
If all matter on Earth comes from the sky, as dust, from the Big Bang or
intermediately from the explosion of a star which was formed previously by the
Big Bang, as this theory claims, it is impossible for the bauxite of Parnasos to
have been concentrated on pin point on a rotating Earth, falling from the sky.
It would rather have formed a deposit on concentric circle line with axle of
rotation of the Earth. Because no deposit on Earth out of the hundred thousands
of deposits forms concentric circles on Earth, none of them has fallen from
the sky on Earth. Therefore, none one of them has come from the Big Bang
somewhere in the sky, some 13.5 billion years or at any other time. So the
Big has not created the Earth. Because the Earth is not an exception, the Big
Bang has not created any heavenly body in the Universe.
So there was no Big Bang with the meaning of creating the Universe ! Q.E.D.
If matter on Earth, therefore, does not come from the sky, it has to be created
from the inside of Earth.
As declared in the front page of the present web site, the above is subject to a hundred thousand reward..., if found in error.
Since matter on the surface of Earth is not coming down from the sky. the origin of this matter should be locally from Earth. The very fact that as a general rule. all left ancient monuments, buildings, structures are found covered by ground or they are underground the present surface level, generally at a rate of two meters per thousand years, independently of the location of these structures. either on the top of a mountain or on a plane. Ie, on the top of Lycion mountain in Peloponese, Greece, the Temple of Epicourios Apollon was found fully buried under ground with no possibility for the ground to have come down from a higher location. Similar case is the buried structures in Delphi, on the Parnassos mountain in Greece in hundreds of different occasions and locations. This proves that on the average the radius of Earth everywhere is increasing at a rate of two meters per thousand years. This rate of increasing Earth radius compares to the known fact of the rate of the continents going apart, as mathematically should had been expected for a globe with an increasing radius.
The extra ground covering up existing ground, either with structures or not, with no possibility for this extra ground to have been brought from a different location, proves that existing ground creates similar ground. This is clearly an expression of the Theory of Continuous Creation of Professor Pappas.
... continuous with more details, numerous examples of the Theory of continuous creation of matter and energy from similar matter and energy by Professor, Doctor Pappas.
Brain storming for expansion
Field of Gravity, Field of
Morphogenesis, For classical Medicine nothing else other than matter, chemistry, materialistic physics exists. No Nuclear activity, No Frequency
communication....
In ancient times. objects were falling always downwards with no exception as today. This seemed to be natural for the objects and no question was raised. No investigation was carried and no development of Celestial Mechanics was achieved, until Isaac Newton realized that the fall of objects downwards is special and exceptional and that there must be a cause that makes objects falling downwards. This cause was the field of Gravity created by the ||Earth and every object, proportionally to its mass. There afterwards, it was a matter of relatively short of time needed to explore Gravity and develop the whole science of celestial mechanics which until then Celestial Mechanics was unthinkable and nothing relevant had been developed for many many thousands of years until then.
Similarly, the proliferation
and shaping of cells coming from a fertilized egg and their gradual
differentiation according to precise positions in the proliferated mass, is
considered natural and no questions are asked. At most, shaping and
differentiation are attributed to the DNA code of the fertilized egg, a chemical
chain characteristic of the fertilized egg.
But again, how may a chemical chain like DNA
guide subsequent shaping and cell differentiation in precise position ? However,
thisn process seemed to
be a natural process, occurring always in similar situations, and no questions
needed to be asked, like the downward fall was to considered to be natural and
no questions should hab been asked. However, if we
think in a similar way like Isaac Newton for the downward fall of objects, who
attributed this fall to the field of Gravity associated with the Earth, then we
should attribute the shaping of proliferation and the associated cell
differentiation on something special associated with the fertilized egg. We call
the causing the shaping and its relevant cell differentiation, the
Field of Morphogenesis of the fertilized egg.
On the other hand, as there is no general principle known in chemistry
indicating how a chemical molecule or chemical chain may guide other
chemical processes, DNA code can not be the concept of the field of
Morphogenesis. DNA can not be, but nothing else than an identification code for
the cells of the same organism
with no possibility to guide other chemical processes.
Classical Biology and Medicine, following the extreme politics of
a materialistic approach for which nothing else may exist for life other than
strict chemistry and physics, ignores any consideration of any Field of
Morphogenesis different than the existing chemical molecules.
Thus, Biology,
like this, prohibits any farther relevant development of
Morphogenesis as a non existing concept. Biology without a concept of
Morphogenic field suffers from a serious scientific gap which prohibits its
farther development to the phenomenon of life.
On the other hand, adopting such a new concept of a guiding field of Morphogenesis for Biology, it will be a matter of short time to explore and discover this field of Morphogenesis, similar to the adoption of the field of Gravity for the celestial bodies, for which it was a matter of short time to develop the concrete science of celestial Mechanics in a short time interval in the human history.
Sodium Potassium Pump - The "Holy Cow" of Medicine and Biology
The diagram shows the classical model. It is based on the factual assumption that Na, K concentration outside a cell are 145 mM/L for Na and 4 mM/L for K. Inside the cell the relevant concentrations are 12 mM/L and 139mM/L. Thus the naive assumption is made that the cell membrane inserts Na and excretes K CONTINUOUSLY at ratio 2 to 3 to keep it inside with a lack of positive charge i.e. -70 mV. This is impossible because at certain time all the K inside the cell will be depleted and the inside will be saturated with Na. UNLESS the Na inside the cell is turned into K by O. I.E.the Na is transmuted into K, utilizing Oxygen. This is the Pappas assumption showing in above Pappas model. The Pappas model explains all the observed facts.
1. The excess of exertion of K with the respect of the intake in the body of K, first found by Louis Kervnan.
2. Why hyperkalemia in the body causes death.
3.Na adds energy. Na is the basis of all energy drinks.
4. We add salt containing Na to all food containing K.
5. Most of human food contains salt, Na
6. Animals not getting salt get sick
7. Farmers provide salty stones for the animals to leak.
8. The word salary comes from the word salt containing Na. In difficult times the salt was precious and it was a mean of exchange thats the where the word salary comes from..
9. Na increases blood pressure, giving energy to the hart.
10 No practical water retention may be caused by a small amount Na. One molecule of Na retains six molecules of water.
11 Opposite roles of Na, K O, Energy in animals vs plants.
12. CO2 is not a fertilizer. for plants
References :
Tainted Truth: The Manipulation of Fact In America .....But "information," however persuasive, is never neutral, and the purpose of this book is to expose the interests that underlie the "truths" we have come to trust. Particularly disturbing, the author notes, is that scientific and academic research, which has traditionally represented the disinterested pursuit of knowledge, is increasingly underwritten by corporate sponsors seeking to manipulate the results... saved
Doubt is Their Product: How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health ....... This well-researched book by someone who truly knows the system is a must read for anyone who wants to understand the cozy relationship between industry and regulatory agencies on matters that affect the health and safety of our families and neighbors. The cited examples illustrate how, with the help of irresponsible members of Congress and other public officials, corporate greed can trump any sense of ethics, morality, and human compassion."--Neal Lane, former Science Advisor to President Bill Clinton and former Director of the National Science Foundation......... saved ditp.htm
DCA το φάρμακο του καρκίνου εμποδίζεται να κυκλοφορήσει
Cancer Cured in Canada? Big Pharma Says NO WAY!