SEE ALSO SECTION (3e), CLICK HERE   FOR SECOND PART

PROPAGANDA IN PHYSICS

The biggest propaganda is for the Theory of Relativity which presumably is verified. However this verification can only happen from a rotating system of reference here on Earth. Relativity theory is concerned only with inertial reference of frames, that is with frames which move with constant velocity and with respect to each other again with constant relative  velocity. This is not the case of Earth any where on it. Earth is absolutely rotating in 24 hours. This rotation can be demonstrated anywhere on it even by non  RELATIVISTIC MECHANICS I.E. BY FOUCAULT'S PENDULUM. in an isolated environment without contact to the outside world. Similarly, the ballistics of artillery depart from their intended target, if the distance of ballistics is too long.
From Earth star moving in 24 hours with a velocity proportional to their distance from Earth, u= ωxr= (24x60x60)^-1xr, for r=300.000.000 meters/secondx24x60x60=2.592x10¹³ meters, distance of 24 hours travel of light, that a very small relative distance for the visible universe.   . Therefore and obviously there are stars moving with superluminal velocities with respect to the Earth, beyond a distance of 2.592x10¹³ meters. For these stars, time should have been slowed down to no rate of time, Therefore, these stars should not develop and should not to reach the state of a supernova to the same extend netrina slow down and reach Earth without time to mature for them to decay with respect to an observers from Earth.  So similarly, there will be distant stars 2.592x10¹³ meters that time never matures to reach the state of a supernova. Nevertheless, netrina verify relativity theory, but propaganda keeps silent for the non existence of stars >2.592x10¹³ meters that do not mature to explosive supernova.
My youngest son, finalist of physics department, Athens University, pointed to me: How do you know that there are no supernova that do no mature and explode?
My answer: It is not only these stars will not mature, but their time according to an observer from Earth, the time will slow so much, that they will not Emit light, therefore for certain distance more far away 2.592x10¹³ meters, all stars according to an observers on the 24 hour rotating Earth would have been dark, therefore, invisible. There are  no missing (invisible) stars after a certain distance of 2.592x10¹³ meters away.. Q.E.D.          

Therefore, for certain phenomena and for observers on the rotating Earth, relativity theory is good, for certain other phenomena that relativity concludes completely unacceptable results, the same theory and for the same observers, the same theory because of propaganda, keeps silent!!!!!!

However, formulas of relativity theory work for certain reference frames. For example the Heliocentric reference frame, not according to this theory, that according to its first axiom all such frames are equivalent, but only for special ones, is valid. For the Foucault experiment, and the ballistics of military artillery, if we choose a short enough time and a short enough distance, we do not observe a practical rotation of the Foucault experiment and no practical departure for the ballistics of artillery.

So, for a correct theory, we should choose an appropriate short distance in space and a short enough duration of time for a particular reference frame to be correct within the specified space time limits to be correct within a certain accuracy. We cdn not choose any so called inertial frame according to special relativity theory and propaganda, for in the first hand, such frames do not exist - no frames are existing with constant relative and absolute velocity!!!!! Except in the special theory of relativity and propaganda.

 Professors, in an auditorium, like to talk proudly and with a superfluous arrogance of an authenticity of perfect presumably theories.

Relativity theory is also for some popular paradoxes, like the twin paradox. Once one of two twins decided to depart. Each one sees the other descending with equal and opposite velocity. Each says for the other that will stay younger due to each velocity. When they will meet again are each equal age or one is older than the other one. The resolution given by the pseudo-theory of relativity is younger who actually undergoes the accelerations of going and returning. But how about both accelerate away of each other and then both approach each other keeping always equal and opposite acceleration like each going on 8 trajectory leaving opposite directions, keeping always equivalency as far as acceleration. There is no resolution then for they are completely equivalent. Theory maintaining its propaganda, stays silent in this case.

If we say in the last case none of the two,. being accelerated can make relativistic predictions for the other, then why observers on the rotating Earth, having (rotational) acceleration, can make relat5ivistic prediction for particles coming to the Earth?

There is NO applicability for special relativity for observers on Earth - NONE, WHAT SO EVER.  RELATIVITY IS A NON PHYSICAL THEORY, ACTUALLY -  A  PROPAGANDA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Classification of Theories according to the observers, which they assume

Special Theory of Relativity, initially, developed by Einstein, was written for non accelerating (inertial) observers. Recently, it is claimed that SR is also expanded to non inertial observers. These expanded theories do not resolve the twin paradox, for the standing and forth going and coming back observer are both equivalent, for they are a non accelerated observer and an accelerated by definition equivalent observers. As in the expanded SR  we can not distinguish the two observers, both they will predict that the other will stay younger. Therefore, either both will be wrong or one will be right and the other wrong. In reality, who will be younger? We shall resolve this paradox, down below, according to realistic Physics.
The twin paradox relies in the very root of S.R., in the allowance to use the Lorentz transformations by whom and how.

TWIN PARADOX RESOLUTION

From the above, we see that the Heliocentric system should be a preferred system of reference, contrary to S.R.T., based on the experimental existing data, today.

 
General Relativity is supposed to be for non inertial observers, just as the extended Relativity, two theories for  the same thing. However, G.R. is considered to the substituted  the Newtonian Gravitation, WITHOUT ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCES IN THE APPROXIMATION.

TRUTH TABLE VERSUS PROPAGANDA

.TIME DELAY OR TIME ADVANCE

IMPORTANT  NOTICE:: WE SEE THAT THE TIME OF A MOVING CLOCK MAY GO FASTER OR SLOWER. THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY PREDICTS ONLY THAT  A MOVING CLOCK MAY GO SLOWER!!!!|||||||||||||||! THIS IS 100% DISPROOF OF RELATIVITY THEORY THAT OBSERVES ONLY FROM THE SAME EARTHLY BOND REFERENCE FRAME. ONCE AGREES, AND ONCE DISPROOF'S RELATIVITY, 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OBVIOUSLY, THE TIME RATE IS DETERMINED BY THE HELIOCENTRIC SYSTEM, AND THE VELOCITY OF THE CLOCK IN THIS SYSTEM, NOT IN THE OBSERVER'S REFERENCE FRAME, AND NOT IN ACCORDANCE TO RELATIVITY THEORY.!! SO THE REFERENCE FRAME OF THE LOCAL PLANETARY SYSTEM DETERMINES THE ABSOLUTE TIME RATE. THE HIGHER VELOCITY IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM WEST-EAST ROUND TRIP (WEST TO EAST ROTATION OF EARTH PLUS WEST TO EAST ALSO SPEED OF AIRPLANE) SLOWS THE CLOCK MORE. THE LOWER IS THE VELOCITY TO THE SOLAR SYSTEM (WEST TO EAST EARTH ROTATION MINUS THE OPPOSITE EAST TO WEST SPEED OF AIRPLANE) , MAKES THE CLOCK FASTER THAN FASTER EARTHLY CLOCKS IN AN ABSOLUTELY MANNER!!

MASSIVENESS AFFECTING  THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT AND THE TIME RATE OF CLOCKS

AS WE SEE ABOVE THE TIME RATE OF A CLOCK DEPENDS ON ITS VELOCITY FROM THE HELIOCENTRIC OR THE SOLAR SYSTEM. IN PHYSICAL SENSE CLOCK'S RATE  IS DETERMINED BY IT'S VELOCITY WITH RESPECT TO THE NEAR DOMINATING MASS, THAT IS THE HUGE RELATIVELY MASS OF THE SUN AS  LONG AS THE CLOCK IS A LITTLE FAR AWAY FROM EARTH. THE FIRST SCIENTIST TO THINK IN THIS RESPECT WAS MILLER IN LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA. MILLER DECIDED TO REPEAT THE MICHELSON EXPERIMENT FOR VARIATIONS IN THE SPEED OF THE LIGHT IN HIGH ALTITUDE, AT THE TOP OF MOUNTAIN WILSON, WHERE A VILLAGE OF NUMEROUS OBSERVATORIES EXISTED ALREADY. PROFESSOR MILLER BUILT A NON MASSIVE AS POSSIBLE INSTALLATION FOR IT AND INDEED MEASURED A VARIATION OF THE VELOCITY OF LIGHT, DEPENDING ON THE INSTANT VELOCITY OF HIS LAB WITH RESPECT TO ITS VELOCITY IN THE SOLAR SYSTEM, THAT IS WITH RESPECT TO THE SUN. PROPAGANDA ATTRIBUTED THIS RESULT TO THE DAILY VARIATION OF TEMPERATURE!  BEFORE THAT, MILLER'S EXPERIMENT TEMPERATURE WAS NOT AN ISSUE FOR THE PREVIOUS SIMILAR EXPERIMENTS DOWN IN VALLEYS, AS  LONG AS  THE SMALL DEVIATIONS WERE ASSUMED TO BE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE PROPAGANDA. IN LATE 1980S, THE AUTHOR VISITED THE TOP OF MOUNTAIN WILSON AND HE HAD TO MAKE INQUIRES TO LOCATE MILLRE'S LAB AND TO RECOGNIZE IT FROM THE PUBLISHED PHOTOGRAPH OF MILLER. HIS LAB WAS TURNED INTO A CARPENTRY SHOP IN THE MEAN TIME.  THERE WAS NO SIGN FOR IT. THE ONLY RELATIVE SIGN WAS THAT EINSTEIN WAS THERE. INDEED EINSTEIN HAD VISITED MILLER'S EXPERIMENT FOR HIS WAS WORRIED FOR IT'S RESULTS

THE AUTHOR IN EARLY 1990S, VISITED FOR A SECOND TIME, THE TOP OF MOUNTAIN WILSON. THIS TIME, THE LAB OF MILNE WAS TURNED DOWN COMPLETELY. NOT EXISTING ANY MORE. WHY ? THE ONLY EVIDENCE FOUND BY THE AUTHOR, WAS A BIG RUSTY BOLT ON THE GROUND, WHICH HE TOOK AS A SOUVENIR OF MILLER'S LAB AND EXPERIMENTS.

THE BIG QUESTION IS: THE HAFALE AND KEATING EXPERIMENT IS SO EASY TO REPRODUCE IN MUCH BETTER TERMS. JUST PLACE ATOMIC CLOCKS IN SATELLITES GOING EAST TO WEST AND WEST TO EAST AND COMPARE THEIR READINGS WITH EARTHLY CLOCKS, IF WE ASSUME THAT SATELITES ARE NOT ALREADY EQUIPPED WITH SUCH CLOCKS. WHAT ARE THE RESULTS :? WHY THEIR RESULTS ARE NOT PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED ? IS PROPAGANDA IMPOSING A CONTINUOUS CENSORSHIP ON EARTHY ?

WHAT IS GOING ON ? SEE ALSO SECTION (3e) CRIMINAL INACCURACIES AND OMISSIONS 

IMPORTANT EXPLANATION: 
THE ABOVE REFERRED AUTHORS (HAFALE AND KEATING), DOWN BELOW, REPORT THEIR FINDINGS WITH TITLES AS PERFECTLY AGREEING WITH RELATIVITY. NO MATTER WHAT THESE AUTHORS BELIEVE THEIR FINDINGS FACTS ARE NOT RELATIVISTIC. HOWEVER WITH RELATIVISTIC TITLES, IT WAS THE ONLY WAY TO HAVE THEIR FINDINGS PUBLISHED IN PEER REVIEW (CONTROLLED JOURNALS BY THE EDITORS, BY CHOOSING THE REVIEWERS  ) (AND ASSUMED SCIENTIFIC) JOURNALS.

ΓΙΑΝΝΗΣ ΠΙΝΕΙ
ΓΙΑΝΝΗΣ ΚΕΡΝΑΕΙ
ΠΟΙΟΣ ΕΙΝΑΙ ΑΥΤΟΣ Ο ΓΙΑΝΝΗΣ ?

CONTINUOUS

CONTINUOUS

CLICK HERE   SECOND PART,TO CONTINUE WITH CRITICISM OF PHYSICS

SEE ALSO SECTION (3e)

REFERENCES

Dayton Miller's Ether-Drift Experiments: A Fresh Look      http://www.orgonelab.org/miller.htm

Science 14 July 1972: Vol. 177. no. 4044, pp. 166 - 168

Around-the-World Atomic Clocks: Predicted Relativistic Time Gains
J. C. Hafele  and Richard E. Keating 

During October 1971, four cesium beam atomic clocks were flown on regularly scheduled commercial jet flights around the world twice, once eastward and once westward, to test Einstein's theory of relativity with macroscopic clocks. From the actual flight paths of each trip, the theory predicts that the flying clocks, compared with reference clocks at the U.S. Naval Observatory, should have lost 40 ± 23 nanoseconds during the eastward trip, and should have gained 275 ± 21 nanoseconds during the westward trip. The observed time differences are presented in the report that follows this one. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/177/4044/166
 

How 21st Century Physicists Are Censored, Suppressed      www.rense.com/general77/21.htm       

Addressing the Need for Freedom in Scientific Research       http://archivefreedom.org/casehistories.htm

Orwell's Thought Police are all too real      www.uri-geller.com/as10.htm

Cognitive Processes and the Suppression of Sound Scientific Ideas    http://amasci.com/supress1.html   

Suppression of dissent       www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/supp.html  

Peer review as scholarly conformity    www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/ss/ss5.html        

CLOSEMINDED SCIENCE     http://amasci.com/weird/wclose.html

TESLA ERASED AT THE SMITHSONIAN...     click here.

Bias in the Scientific Literature   http://d1002391.mydomainwebhost.com/JOT/Links/links-bias.htm

BENDING SCIENCE               http://www.books.gr/ViewShopProduct.aspx?Id=5090288